Skip to main content

vim 集成调试

今天用gdb调试时突然想到,为什么以前没想到把它和vim集成起来呢?

于是...哦,我不是开始动手编程,而是开始上网搜vim插件...

在vim.org找到一些,一开始下了个rating较高的idevim(解压后叫gdbvim),不过不大好使,而且费了些工夫才删掉...

然后又试了试vimDebug,感觉这个还不错,只是有个小问题,关于gdb启动时的参数,这个插件是自动按当前文件名确定可执行文件名,这个不大好,虽然\s/可以带参数启动debugger,不过参数仍是放在它自动确定的可执行文件名的后面...

经过一番尝试,最终解决方案如下:

修改vimDebug.vim,在120行左右

把 let l:cmd = "vdd.pl " . l:debugger . " " . l:fileName 中最后的. l:filename去掉,改为
let l:cmd = "vdd.pl " . l:debugger . " "

这样虽然按不能正常启动了(实际上本来就不好用),但是\s/加可执行文件名可以正常调用gdb

不错.

但是似乎还有写小问题,作者在USAGE写了, 再研究研究吧.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to  migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later,  gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with  --userns=auto  and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared  various networking options  and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...

Fix Google Security Code

Google Security Code (http://g.co/sc) is one type of 2-step verification. This is particularly useful when security keys and passkeys are not available. I have been using it in my LXC containers, until today I found out that it stopped working. It just kept saying "The code is invalid". It is easy to rule out some factors: The code works on other browsers on my laptop. The code works on other devices that are directly connected to the router. So it appears that Google also checks IP addresses besides the security code. Recently I have IPv6 enabled, so most devices that are directly connected to the router have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. But  I only enabled IPv4 for my LXC containers. So I guess when a code is generated by device A and used by device B, Google should be able to check that device A and device B are closely located. But in my case, IPv6 address appears on device A but not on device B, which may look suspicious. To fix the problem, I just needed to disable IPv...

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...