Skip to main content

再谈声卡识别但不出声的问题

上次在一个关于声卡识别的问题提到了一个关于声卡在设备管理器中能够识别, 但是声音选项中缺说找不到音频设备的问题。

我转的解法是用Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator替换一个已有设备ISAPNP Read Data Port。起初我认为是识别有误,

但后来感到有些不对劲, 觉得那本身是一个正常的系统设备。 虽然能正常工作, 但毕竟不是完美解决方案。 后来再次尝试了上次

也提到的重装Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator的方法:

1.假设windows装在c:\windows下, 将c:\windows\inf\machine.inf, c:\windows\system32\streamci.dll, c:\windows\system32

\drivers\swenum.sys拷到一个临时目录下

2.修改machine.inf,找到[ControlFlags], 把下面一行ExcludeFromSelect=*删去

3.如果现在设备管理器中有Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator, 那么用现在的临时目录给它更新驱动即可,否则依次进

入控制面板->添加硬件, 几次"下一步"后依次选"添加新的硬件设备","安装我手动从列表选择的硬件","显示所有设备","从磁盘

安装", 此时选那个目录, 然后厂商选"(标准系统设备)", 型号选"Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator", 然后安装便可



最后还查到一个解法, 是说在注册表中删除所有swenum的相关项, 然后就能自动识别Plug and Play Software Device Enumerator

了, 不过这个没试过, 不知是否真的可行。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Determine Perspective Lines With Off-page Vanishing Point

In perspective drawing, a vanishing point represents a group of parallel lines, in other words, a direction. For any point on the paper, if we want a line towards the same direction (in the 3d space), we simply draw a line through it and the vanishing point. But sometimes the vanishing point is too far away, such that it is outside the paper/canvas. In this example, we have a point P and two perspective lines L1 and L2. The vanishing point VP is naturally the intersection of L1 and L2. The task is to draw a line through P and VP, without having VP on the paper. I am aware of a few traditional solutions: 1. Use extra pieces of paper such that we can extend L1 and L2 until we see VP. 2. Draw everything in a smaller scale, such that we can see both P and VP on the paper. Draw the line and scale everything back. 3. Draw a perspective grid using the Brewer Method. #1 and #2 might be quite practical. #3 may not guarantee a solution, unless we can measure distances/p...

Qubes OS: First Impressions

A few days ago, while browsing security topics online, Qubes OS surfaced—whether via YouTube recommendations or search results, I can't recall precisely. Intrigued by its unique approach to security through compartmentalization, I delved into the documentation and watched some demos. My interest was piqued enough that I felt compelled to install it and give it a try firsthand. My overall first impression of Qubes OS is highly positive. Had I discovered it earlier, I might have reconsidered starting my hardware password manager project. Conceptually, Qubes OS is not much different from running a bunch of virtual machines simultaneously. However, its brilliance lies in the seamless desktop integration and the well-designed template system, making it far more user-friendly than a manual VM setup. I was particularly impressed by the concept of disposable VMs for temporary tasks and the clear separation of critical functions like networking (sys-net) and USB handling (sys-usb) into the...

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...