WangLu's Notes

When I have important data on a device, I back it up to my server using dedicated user accounts. The other day, I checked /etc/passwd on my server and found entries like this: some-backup-user1:x:1003:1004:... some-backup-user2:x:1004:1007:... A few inconsistencies immediately bothered me: UID/GID Mismatches: Many users have UIDs that don't match their primary GIDs. While this technically works and might seem like just an aesthetic concern, I realized that UIDs and GIDs are crucial metadata. I need to preserve them accurately for future system migrations to maintain correct file ownership.ID Ambiguity: ID Ambiguity: The same number (e.g., 1004) could represent a User ID for one account and a Group ID for a completely different group. This overlap is a recipe for mistakes during administration tasks if I'm not paying close attention. Lack of Structure: User and group accounts created for very different purposes – regular logins, backup processes, container management, specifi...

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...

A few days ago, while browsing security topics online, Qubes OS surfaced—whether via YouTube recommendations or search results, I can't recall precisely. Intrigued by its unique approach to security through compartmentalization, I delved into the documentation and watched some demos. My interest was piqued enough that I felt compelled to install it and give it a try firsthand. My overall first impression of Qubes OS is highly positive. Had I discovered it earlier, I might have reconsidered starting my hardware password manager project. Conceptually, Qubes OS is not much different from running a bunch of virtual machines simultaneously. However, its brilliance lies in the seamless desktop integration and the well-designed template system, making it far more user-friendly than a manual VM setup. I was particularly impressed by the concept of disposable VMs for temporary tasks and the clear separation of critical functions like networking (sys-net) and USB handling (sys-usb) into the...

For the past month, I've been prototyping my own hardware password manager using the Cardputer , a compact device that's surprisingly perfect for the task.  I learned about the Cardputer while searching for the ideal hardware to build a password manager. It's essentially a microcontroller (the ESP32-S3) packed with a screen and a keyboard. What really sold me on it were these features: Direct Interaction: I can interact directly with the device – typing my master password, searching for credentials, and confirming password entry, all on the Cardputer itself. USB Keyboard Emulation: The device can seamlessly emulate a USB keyboard, allowing for both manual and automatic password entry into other devices. Hardware-Accelerated Crypto: The ESP32-S3 boasts hardware acceleration for AES and SHA operations, crucial for secure password management. Secure Element Integration:  The Cardputer supports an optional ATECC608B secure element (available as an official accessory ), provid...

Flash encryption and secure boot are useful security features for ESP32S3 chip. While not perfect, they definitely make it harder to extract the secrets in the chip. However, it is tricky to enable both features at the same time. The topic is actually discussed in the official documentation: ESP32S3 Security Features Security Features Enablement Workflows Especially, the second one mentioned it is recommended to enable flash encryption before secure boot. But I still find the documentation confusing. In the end I was able to successfully enable both, here's my findings. My Understanding After my adventure, here's what I think could have worked. WARNING, this is untested. Follow  Security Features Enablement Workflows : Burn all the keys, as long as their purpose eFuses and read/write protections Burn other security eFuses, but DO NOT burn ENABLE_SECURITY_DOWNLOAD in the middle, which is mentined at the end of the instruction for both flash encryption and secure boot. Burn...

[Updates 2025-01-20] The original blog post assumes that all passwords are stored in one password manager, and the password manager either unlocks everything or nothing (e.g. Keepass). After discussing with friends, I realized that if I use something like pass , and I use a hardware GPG token, I can actually store and sync all encrypted passwords to all devices, because I will only decrypt the passwords on demand, and the computer will not see the GPG private key. The compromise is that the computer will see the list of all password entries (e.g. accounts), as well as a few other issues . I've been using Keepass for many years. I don't use online password services because I cannot fully trust them. Besides, I may not always have Internet connection, which is why I also don't use a self-hosted service. Everything has been working fine, until I turn my paranoid knob to the max. Here's the thought experiment . The Imaginary Scenario Let's say I have 100 PCs for differe...