Skip to main content

ESP32S3: Flash Encryption and Secure Boot

Flash encryption and secure boot are useful security features for ESP32S3 chip. While not perfect, they definitely make it harder to extract the secrets in the chip.

However, it is tricky to enable both features at the same time. The topic is actually discussed in the official documentation:

Especially, the second one mentioned it is recommended to enable flash encryption before secure boot. But I still find the documentation confusing.

In the end I was able to successfully enable both, here's my findings.

My Understanding

After my adventure, here's what I think could have worked. WARNING, this is untested.

  • Follow Security Features Enablement Workflows:
    • Burn all the keys, as long as their purpose eFuses and read/write protections
    • Burn other security eFuses, but DO NOT burn ENABLE_SECURITY_DOWNLOAD in the middle, which is mentined at the end of the instruction for both flash encryption and secure boot.
    • Burn SPI_BOOT_CRYPT_CNT (all 3 bits) and SECURE_BOOT_EN
  • Sign bootloader and application
  • Encrypt signed bootloader, partition table and signed application
  • Flash three encrypted pieces into correct offsets.

My Actual Adventure

I had thought the official bootloader was necessary to enable the features, so I actually downloaded ESP-IDF and flashed the bootloader as the last step of enabling flash encryption. Later I found that ENABLE_SECURITY_DOWNLOAD had been automatically burned by the bootloader, because I used the recommended "secure download mode" option in `idf.py menuconfig`.

This is not the end of the world, it just meant I could no longer use `espefuse.py`. I could actually use the C API to burn the eFuses. The API is actually quite user-friendly, and the high-level functions (e.g. burn key, purpose and read/write protection at the same time) do check common errors. I just had to read the documentation to understand the differences between blocks, bits and registers.


One more thing about the bootloader: A recent version (5.3-ish) of ESP-IDF changed something about application image header, which is no longer compatible with esp-hal before this change, this took me quite a while to figure out.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to  migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later,  gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with  --userns=auto  and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared  various networking options  and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...
Post a Comment
Read More »

GameConqueror 0.09 -- Linux Game Hacking Tool

If you are a game hacker If you've been looking for a `CheatEngine for Linux` Then you can't miss this. ============================================== GameConqueror is a game hacking tool for linux, it's written in PyGTK and uses scanmem as its backend. It's supposed to be with most useful features of CheatEngine for Linux. Currently, I've implemented almost everything about scanning, involving variant data types and scan types: Data Types: int{8/16/32/64}, float{32/64}, unknown type(int or float) and unknown width(will try each of them), byte array and string Scan Types: equal, greater, less, changed, unchanged, increased(by), decreased(by) This should be enough for most cases, so I decided to release it at the current status. ============================================= Here's how you can get it PPA (for Ubuntu users) https://launchpad.net/~coolwanglu/+archive/scanmem (I've not test it in 32bit environments or Jaunty, do please inform me if it doe...
Post a Comment
Read More »

Fix Google Security Code

Google Security Code (http://g.co/sc) is one type of 2-step verification. This is particularly useful when security keys and passkeys are not available. I have been using it in my LXC containers, until today I found out that it stopped working. It just kept saying "The code is invalid". It is easy to rule out some factors: The code works on other browsers on my laptop. The code works on other devices that are directly connected to the router. So it appears that Google also checks IP addresses besides the security code. Recently I have IPv6 enabled, so most devices that are directly connected to the router have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. But  I only enabled IPv4 for my LXC containers. So I guess when a code is generated by device A and used by device B, Google should be able to check that device A and device B are closely located. But in my case, IPv6 address appears on device A but not on device B, which may look suspicious. To fix the problem, I just needed to disable IPv...
Post a Comment
Read More »