Skip to main content

Screen Color Calibration


configure softwares
gimp: edit->preferences->color management->try to use system monitor profile
firefox: about:config -> gfx.color_management.mode -> 1
 
test pages


I bought a spyder 4 express and would like to try dispcalGUI on my surface pro, so I have to install Argyll CMS's driver, which is not signed.

For windows 8, one option to disable driver signature enforcement is through "advanced startup settings", which lists a few options after a restart, and you can press f7 or 7 to disable it.
However for my surface pro, it refused to recognize my keyboard, no matter it is a bluebooth keyboard, a usb wireless keyboard or a normal usb keyboard.
I guess a touch/type cover might work, but I don't have one.

Another option is to enable test mode (bcdedit -set testsigning on), before which you should also disable secure boot in the bios setting 
(shut down the device, hold the volumn up key before pressing the power button and release it when you see the surface logo)
However in this case, any signed driver could be installed, but unsigned drivers are still rejected.
For windows 7, there are words that you may use dseo13b to hack, but no luck for me on windows 8.

I had thought about using my Linux VM to do the calibration, which is running under Hyper-V, but unfortunately Hyper-V does not support USB forwarding.
I'd even thought about other VM softwares, but according to the Internet, it might not work. (because VM may not access the graphics card)

Another solution came into my mind is to boot up the device with a Linux on a USB stick, then I'll be able to do whatever I want. 
But there is only one USB port on Surface Pro, and I'm not sure if USB boot or Spyder would work behind a USB hub.

Finally I gave up.

Other possible solutions:
- Sign the driver with WDK, with your own certificates
- Install Linux and free the power of the device


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to  migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later,  gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with  --userns=auto  and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared  various networking options  and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...

mkosi: First Impressions

I stumbled upon the Gentoo wiki page for systemd-nspawn , which in turn led me to nspawn.org , mkosi , and later systemd-sysupdate . mkosi quickly caught my eye because it's almost exactly what I wanted to build myself, as mentioned in a previous post . So, I decided to spend my "sysadmin fun quota" on it. Overview mkosi is similar to docker build or podman build , but it's designed for creating full OS images. It focuses on development and testing. For example, much like nix-shell , mkosi can quickly launch a sandboxed shell with a specific distribution and selected packages installed. The systemd project itself uses mkosi for testing across different distros. The re-introduction article  is a great read. Speed Note that this is by no means a rigid benchmark. My setup is an SSD with LUKS and an ext4 filesystem (without reflink support). Building Container Images mkosi is pretty fast. A simple mkosi command creates a fresh Debian image. I used the --incrementa...