Skip to main content

Euclidea 14.5 解法与证明

Euclidea 14.5

如图，给定三个两两相切的圆，O，O_1， O_2。三个圆心共线。

任务：尺规作出一个圆，与给定的三个圆都相切。



解法：


  1. 设圆O与圆O_1的切点为A
  2. 连接OA
  3. 过O做OA垂线交圆O于D
  4. 以D为圆心，DA为半径作圆，交圆O_1和圆O_2于E和F。
  5. 作直线EO_1和FO_2交于G
  6. 以G为圆心，GE为半径作圆
  7. 圆G即为所求圆



简要证明：

  1. 如图，设三个圆切点为A，B，C。明显A，B，C，O，O_1，O_2五点共线。
  2. 以A为中心作反演变换，取反演圆与圆O_2正交。于是圆O_2经反演变换后不变。B，C互为反演点。
  3. 分别过B和C做AB的垂线L_B和L_C。易知圆O1和圆O经反演变换后分别为L_B和L_C。
  4. 如图作圆G'同时与圆O_2，L_B和L_C相切于E'和F'。
  5. 过E'F'作直线L，易证C在L上，并且∠E'CB为45°。
  6. 设L经过反演变换得到的圆为圆D'，考虑圆D'的性质：
    1. 直线AD'与直线L垂直
    2. 圆D'经过A（因为L不经过A）
    3. 圆D'经过B（因为L经过C，而B，C互为反演点）
  7. 于是可知圆D就是圆D'，因此E和E', F和F'分别互为反演点。
  8. 设圆G'经过反演变换为圆G''。因为圆G'与L_B和圆O_2相切于E'和F'，所以圆G''与圆O_1和圆O_2相切于E和F。
  9. 所以G''即是EO_1和FO_2的交点，且圆G''半径是G''E。于是圆G即是圆G''。
  10. 因为圆G'与L_B，圆O_2，L_C都相切，所以圆G与三个给定圆都相切。证明完毕。

参考资料：Pappus chain


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...
Post a Comment
Read More »

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to  migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later,  gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with  --userns=auto  and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared  various networking options  and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...
Post a Comment
Read More »

Determine Perspective Lines With Off-page Vanishing Point

In perspective drawing, a vanishing point represents a group of parallel lines, in other words, a direction. For any point on the paper, if we want a line towards the same direction (in the 3d space), we simply draw a line through it and the vanishing point. But sometimes the vanishing point is too far away, such that it is outside the paper/canvas. In this example, we have a point P and two perspective lines L1 and L2. The vanishing point VP is naturally the intersection of L1 and L2. The task is to draw a line through P and VP, without having VP on the paper. I am aware of a few traditional solutions: 1. Use extra pieces of paper such that we can extend L1 and L2 until we see VP. 2. Draw everything in a smaller scale, such that we can see both P and VP on the paper. Draw the line and scale everything back. 3. Draw a perspective grid using the Brewer Method. #1 and #2 might be quite practical. #3 may not guarantee a solution, unless we can measure distances/p...
3 comments
Read More »