有关swf加密的一点感想

最近想把某flash游戏的1代和2代下载下来玩，但是都有域名验证，于是只好搬出decompiler

1代没有加密，结果是这么判断的

if(_url.indexOf("http://") != -1){
// ok
}else{
// error
}

当然直接爆破就好了
2代加了密，而且好像是swfencypt的模式，一开始是想放弃了,但是一想其实那个swfencrypt只是插了段恶心的tag，代码其实没有变，所以想碰碰运气

于是接着看1代的raw code，如下

//96 0e 00 08 00 07 01 00 00 00 08 01 07 0f 00 00 00
_push "http://" 1 "" 15
//22
_getProperty
//96 02 00 08 02
_push "indexOf"
//52
_callMethod
//96 05 00 07 ff ff ff ff
_push 4294967295
//49
_equals2
//12
_not
//4c
_dup
//12
_not
//9d 02 00 23 00
_if true goto #21

原来得到_url是靠压一个0f进栈，然后调22

然后拿ue去2代的swf里搜0f 00 00 00 22，只有一处，我晕，然后往后看，很多都和1代代码相似，只是'indexOf'的位置不一样，所以push的值也有少许区别。

由于判断的是!=，所以一般会有个not，结果不远处果然有个 12 9d，然后把12改成01。

然后竟然就能玩了。。。

感想是：

1.swfencrypt的加密某种方面来说还是很弱
2.写代码时注意安全才是最重要的 -- 但是给程序员带来了而外的麻烦。。。
3.今天运气不错~~

Comments

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later, gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with --userns=auto and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared various networking options and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...

Determine Perspective Lines With Off-page Vanishing Point

In perspective drawing, a vanishing point represents a group of parallel lines, in other words, a direction. For any point on the paper, if we want a line towards the same direction (in the 3d space), we simply draw a line through it and the vanishing point. But sometimes the vanishing point is too far away, such that it is outside the paper/canvas. In this example, we have a point P and two perspective lines L1 and L2. The vanishing point VP is naturally the intersection of L1 and L2. The task is to draw a line through P and VP, without having VP on the paper. I am aware of a few traditional solutions: 1. Use extra pieces of paper such that we can extend L1 and L2 until we see VP. 2. Draw everything in a smaller scale, such that we can see both P and VP on the paper. Draw the line and scale everything back. 3. Draw a perspective grid using the Brewer Method. #1 and #2 might be quite practical. #3 may not guarantee a solution, unless we can measure distances/p...

WangLu's Notes

Search This Blog