Skip to main content

mldonkey+sancho试用

参考http://forum.ubuntu.org.cn/about42337.html
http://www.haijd.net/doc/read-29.html
http://sparkplugcn.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/%e4%bb%8eemule%e5%88%b0mldonkey/

很多地方说mldonkey比amule如何如何好,而我觉得 amule本身就挺好,下完了最近几个文件后想尝试一下mldonkey

首先我是想编译一个不带 gui的 mlnet, 按照它代码里的readme, 只需简单地./configure然后make就行了,但是我这里却说需要 ocaml (readme里似乎是说只有 gui版本才需要),一开始让它自动下载编译ocaml, 但很慢,于是放弃,改用二进制包。

之后是前端,推荐的是sancho, 我下了个gtk版本的。

再之后按着帖子里的大概弄弄,配置些关于网络的东西,然后再用mldonkey release里带的插件把firefox和mldonkey关联上,需要强调的几点是

1.导入文件似乎只能下载后再本地导入
2.以下命令可以用sachon的console输入,好像也可以用telnet连接mlnet输入
2.用servers命令导入服务器,推荐下载http://www.emule.org.cn/server.met
3.用ov_load命令导入overnet的node列表,推荐下载http://download.overnet.org/contact.dat
4.用kad_load命令导入kad的node列表,推荐下载http://www.emule-inside.net/nodes.dat,也可使用eMule的nodes.data
5.注意把kad和overnet的选项打开,我一开始就忘了。。
6.注意修改最大下载限速,默认是50,太小了


感觉上如果设好了确实挺快,但也没有传说中的那么快,当然可能跟我这里网络环境有关。但是它可以连接多个服务器确实是个创新的想法

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Exploring Immutable Distros and Declarative Management

My current server setup, based on Debian Stable and Docker, has served me reliably for years. It's stable, familiar, and gets the job done. However, an intriguing article I revisited recently about Fedora CoreOS, rpm-ostree, and OSTree native containers sparked my curiosity and sent me down a rabbit hole exploring alternative approaches to system management. Could there be a better way? Core Goals & Requirements Before diving into new technologies, I wanted to define what "better" means for my use case: The base operating system must update automatically and reliably. Hosted services (applications) should be updatable either automatically or manually, depending on the service. Configuration and data files need to be easy to modify, and crucially, automatically tracked and backed up. Current Setup: Debian Stable + Docker My current infrastructure consists of several servers, all running Debian Stable. System Updates are andled automatically via unattended-upgrades. Se...

A Rocky Migration: Moving from docker-compose to Podman and gVisor

I've been running a few containers for several years. They were all running under rootless Docker with a single user. Initially, I planned to  migrate the containers to VMs , but I couldn't get a stable workflow after about two months of effort. Later,  gVisor caught my attention , and I decided to migrate to Podman with gVisor instead. The new plan is to run each container with  --userns=auto  and use Quadlet for systemd integration. This approach provides better isolation and makes writing firewall rules easier. I'm now close to migrating all my containers. Here are a couple of rough edges I'd like to share. Network Layout I compared  various networking options  and spent a few hours trying the one-interface-per-group approach before giving up. I settled on a single macvlan network and decided to use static IP addresses for my containers. To prevent a randomly assigned IP address from conflicting with a predefined one, I allocated a large IP range for my ...

Determine Perspective Lines With Off-page Vanishing Point

In perspective drawing, a vanishing point represents a group of parallel lines, in other words, a direction. For any point on the paper, if we want a line towards the same direction (in the 3d space), we simply draw a line through it and the vanishing point. But sometimes the vanishing point is too far away, such that it is outside the paper/canvas. In this example, we have a point P and two perspective lines L1 and L2. The vanishing point VP is naturally the intersection of L1 and L2. The task is to draw a line through P and VP, without having VP on the paper. I am aware of a few traditional solutions: 1. Use extra pieces of paper such that we can extend L1 and L2 until we see VP. 2. Draw everything in a smaller scale, such that we can see both P and VP on the paper. Draw the line and scale everything back. 3. Draw a perspective grid using the Brewer Method. #1 and #2 might be quite practical. #3 may not guarantee a solution, unless we can measure distances/p...